DIFA, Confirmation of Analytical and Measurable Bookkeeping, is acquiring acknowledgment because of its significance in confronting corruptive strategic policies and monetary robbery. Be that as it may, the shortfall of Legal Bookkeeping (FA) is as yet seen in nations of misty strategic policies. Moreover, just a couple of colleges across the world are presenting DIFA, subsequently, significant work must be finished to reveal the insight into the significance of the recognition in any case and afterward offer it as an authority confirmation with courses connecting with FA whether in colleges or monetary establishments.

The main issue lies in the way that Scientific Bookkeeping is neither given in colleges as a confirmation nor at monetary foundations to distinguish extortion and make legitimate court reports. In numerous colleges of Canada and the US, the DIFA is being remembered for the educational plan to enlist new understudies and give abilities set to professional success through the improvement of a specific specialty. One of the goals of the Partnership for Greatness in Analytical and Legal Bookkeeping (Coalition), laid out by the Canadian Foundation of Sanctioned Bookkeepers (CICA), is to create and deal with an expert certificate program. This recognition is planned as a far-reaching program for somebody who wishes to rehearse around here. CPA, CFA, CIA are instances of authentications allowed in Lebanon, in any case, no recognition is accessible connected with Criminological Bookkeeping. Subsequently, it very well may be a recognition given in instructive establishments that award CPA or some other certificate connected with evaluating or bookkeeping.

Besides, the significance of taking on FA in the colleges’ bookkeeping educational plan is featured particularly that its interest for it is expanding steadily. Such reception has a gigantic potential to upgrade understudies’ abilities and capabilities and could be utilized as a genuine asset from which extortion could be relieved. New alumni can too achieve the DIFA program which gives a wide scope of information and abilities to do monetary examinations. This reach incorporates bookkeeping, review, personal expense information, misrepresentation information, information on regulation and rules of proof, an insightful attitude and basic wariness, comprehension of brain science and inspiration, and solid relational abilities (Stott, 2005).

The program centers around information and abilities that can be best educated and analyzed face to face: like taking care of an up close and personal gathering with a client, talking with abilities, and affirming in court as a specialist witness. DIFA upholds bookkeepers with the information and abilities expected to overcome any issues between existing evaluation models and standards and different prosecution settings (Stott, 2005).

In view of engaging measurements of study results directed in Lebanon, being a nation of hazy strategic policies, to recognize the endorsements that a criminological bookkeeper should have showed that:

• 59.09% of the respondents believed that a measurable bookkeeper ought to have a DIFA;
• 31.82% suggested that CPA is the required authentication (Guaranteed Public Bookkeeper);
• 20.91% idea that CFA is the fitting one (Contracted Monetary Examiner);
• 10.00% referenced different kinds of certificate.

2.12% of the respondents didn’t track down it important to have any certificate to turn into a measurable bookkeeper.
Moreover, the connection among occupation and the respondents’ viewpoint about the kinds of confirmations that a criminological bookkeeper should have was likewise contemplated. The accompanying breakdown shows the rates of respondents who recommended that DIFA is the significant confirmation in view of occupation.